Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 3261 - 3280 of 31,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 7:02 am by Serafini, Michalowski, Derkacz
In the case of Chantelle Buckner v City of Lansing, 480 Mich 1243 (2008) Justice Taylor's court told the dead child's family that the City of Lansing had no responsibility for plowing the snow off the street and blocking the sidewalk forcing the children into the street where she was struck and killed. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In Bond v Lichtenstein (pdf), decided July 15, 2014, Justice Mendez granted a mother summary judgment in lieu of complaint under C.P.L.R. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:42 pm
" You can access today's ruling of the Supreme Court of Virginia in Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:59 am
View the article here10/30/2007US Supreme Court takes up the case of a man convicted of trying to distribute make-believe porn.Washington - Congress has long been concerned about the use of the Internet as an anonymous medium for the sale or exchange of child pornography.In response, law-enforcement officials have maintained an aggressive posture through undercover operations to shut down a thriving illicit market that victimizes children.But emerging technology is presenting new challenges… [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
Brown, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that areview of the text message exchange between defendant and D.H. establishes a prima facie case for child endangerment.See State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 8:21 am by Lee Davis
At the end of last month, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on two unrelated child pornography cases, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court upholds the search of a man who was arrested for possessing child pornography, involving the "good faith" exception under the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Background Three years ago in AA (Somalia) v ECO (Addis Ababa) [2013] UKSC 81, the Supreme Court considered whether a Somali child in her brother-in-law’s care under the doctrine of Kafalah – a process of legal guardianship and the Islamic equivalent to adoption – was an adopted child under the Immigration Rules, paragraph 352D relating to leave to enter or remain as the child of a refugee. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:30 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Exhibiting Harmful Material to a Child Sufficiency of the evidence; jury instructions [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
The Gosserand court disagreed and held that since there was a “home state”, that was the strongest jurisdictional base and there was insufficient evidence to overcome it, and the “home state” was the appropriate jurisdiction.In Theresa Schoenecke, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]