Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
”[14] These partial acquisitions thus may “change incentives so as to otherwise dampen competition. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
BER-C-54-21FILEDJUL 12 2021 James J. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am
Fry v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
I’d appreciate any comments on how to make it better—thanks in advance! [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
But the mere possibility that interception of the communication is technologically feasible does not render public a communication that is otherwise private. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
However, the traditional “surviving patent” approach according to Harnkatheterset is now under some scrutiny: A referral to the CJEU by Munich I Regional Court resulted in the decision C-44/21 Phoenix Contact v Harting, in which it was held that a “surviving patent only” approach is incompatible with the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm
See e.g., Appeal of Zenith National Insurance Corp. and Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Judges derive insider trading violations from Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (together known as the “SEC’s antifraud provisions”), and are a “catchall” aimed at fraud, requiring some sort of “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” or some action, which would otherwise “operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Lollar, Karin D. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Lollar, Karin D. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From DeHart v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
(d)) Clarifies that the requirement that employees must be employed for 30 calendar days prior to use of F [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
P. 166a(c). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
” Merritt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Heppner v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am
§ 1002.85(d). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
