Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 3261 - 3280 of 5,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:51 am
  Part II presents both sides of the debate and why either side does or does not want the act to be passed. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:50 am by Colby Pastre
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
The First Amendment…does not prohibit the State from insuring that the stream of commercial information flows cleanly as well as freely. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:17 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Among other requirements,[1] FL HB 3 imposes fair access requirements on certain financial institutions. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:05 am
While laudable, this entry point clouds an assessment of where the legal system is moving because it neglects the fundamental role of the political power organizing it: the CCP.The legal system does not operate in a vacuum. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
" The analysis centers political ideology and its formal expression through law, regulation, guidance, and operational supervision (theory does matter in this context, perhaps a lot). [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
In effect, they sought to defend the appeal by arguing that Lambeth had been and remained in continuous breach of its duty under s.39(5)(aa). [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
In effect, they sought to defend the appeal by arguing that Lambeth had been and remained in continuous breach of its duty under s.39(5)(aa). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:33 pm by Bill Marler
  As of March 17, 2020, 39 people infected with the outbreak strain of E. coli O103 have been reported from six states: Florida (1); Illinois (6); Iowa (3); Missouri (1); Texas (1); and Utah (27). [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took… [read post]