Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 3261 - 3280 of 3,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Gordon Firemark
The actor contended that he owned half of the show’s copyright but had not been paid his share of the profits.In Wednesday’s ruling, Judge Michael Stern ordered Rysher Entertainment to pay pre-judgment interest to the actor on top of the verdict, bringing the total sum to more than $51 million. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
G 5/83 [2-5]; G 1/07 [3.1]; G 2/08 [4]). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:24 am by Cleve Clinton & Jamie Ribman
Effective September 1, 2007, a person need not have a CHL to carry a handgun in a motor vehicle (including a recreational vehicle with living quarters). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
., [Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts], § 51, at 341-42 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm
This does not mean that parents have to treat their children equally. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Be aware that this reluctance alone does not mean an alternate structure is not viable and/or desirable. 4. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
Using sex and promises of money, she persuaded two men to kill for her in a failed effort to gain $250,000 in life insurance.Julian Lewis, 51, and C.J. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The international legal community recognizes the same sources of international law as does the United States’ legal system. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
“Relative checks”: towards optimal control of administrative power. 51 Wm. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 11:51 am by charonqc
Eady stepping down as top libel judge does not affect the need for libel reform David Allen Green, author of the Jack of Kent blog, writes in The New Statesman: From 1 October 2010, Sir David Eady will no longer be the senior libel and privacy judge at the High Court (also see report here). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
In addition, since that interpretation implies that the ground for refusal under Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 is applicable only where all the essential characteristics of the sign are functional, it ensures that such a sign cannot be refused registration as a trade mark under that provision if the shape of the goods at issue incorporates a major non-functional element, such as a decorative or imaginative element which plays an important role in the shape.53 As regards the… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Thank god football is back, where else but NFL week 1 does blind faith reign supreme and delusional face painters make crazy predictions about future outcomes….but enough about Dallas Cowboy fans. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
What counsel does virtue ethics offer those who lack the full complement of human excellence? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
§ 1104(a)(1), although their discussion of the issue in their appellate brief does not cite that provision.It is an interesting question whether the fiduciary duties imposed by § 404(a)(1) include a duty of disclosure. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the Board finds that the present case is rather to be decided according to the established case law already recalled in the decision under appeal, i.e. by taking into account that a prior art document does not render available matter whose identification requires twofold selection among two lists of alternatives in that document (see Case Law of the Board of Appeal, 5th Edition, 2006, I.C.4.2.3). [1.5] Therefore, the Board concurs with the finding of the OD that the subject-matter of… [read post]