Search for: "English v. English" Results 3261 - 3280 of 11,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 3:51 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Fundamental policy of Indian law is violated if core issues for grant of relief are not examined National Highways Authority of India v Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited (Supreme Court, 13 July 2018)The Supreme Court recently decided a very interesting case about the mandatory participation in a tender process to exercise the right of first refusal. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 1:33 am by Adeline Chong
The former test derives from Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson [1971] AC 458. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am by Roel van Woudenberg
" The English translation of this, "The appeal against the Decision ... is inadmissible", is incorrect, whereas the German translation is accurate: "Die Beschwerde ... gilt als nicht eingelegt. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
James-Bowen v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ([2018] UKSC 40) suggests that the English law of negligence is unlikely to continue to expand to provide further protection to reputation outside defamation. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Older English cases may be interesting for common law history but that’s not necessarily what Art. [read post]
In a blow for rights-holders, the UK Supreme Court has today decided that ISPs should not bear the implementation costs for website blocking orders in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2018] UKSC 28. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by ROS BEVER, PARTNER IRWIN MITCHELL
It is clear the English courts are increasingly looking to encourage spouses to have financial independence from one another. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
A number of important media law cases have been decided by the English courts in the past 12 months including Sir Cliff Richard OBE v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) this has perhaps been the most high profile and discussed case of the year and has been the subject of a wide range of Inforrm posts including by Robin Callender-Smith, Jonathan Coad, Paul Wragg, Brian Cathcart, Jelena Gligorijević and Thomas Bennett (Parts 1 and 2). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
If I cause customers to avoid your business because I express critical opinions about your business—or because I publicly criticize any customers who visit your business (see NAACP v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
  As far as acquired distinctiveness was concerned, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness in Member States where English is spoken or commonly used, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own.2. [read post]