Search for: "FRANK GRANT" Results 3261 - 3280 of 3,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 3:17 pm by David Friedman
[Received from Robert Frank, and posted with his permission] Many thanks to David for his spirited reply. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:00 pm by Rumpole
It was defended by Frank Angones, (former President of The Florida Bar). [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Thus, the court granted a permanent injunction against further use of her image and summary judgment on the issue of liability. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Rapoport cites, as support for his proposition, a Frank Luntz poll that “found commuters would pay more to drive, if it would cut traffic delays. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  I’ll be frank: guns scare me. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:50 am by Bexis
Frank Pallone, Jr. introduced a bill in the House of Representatives misleadingly entitled the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Mandelman
Then, after months of fighting between Barney Frank and POTUS, July of 2008 rolled around, and President Bush finally signed the bill that would create the infamous Hope-4-Homeowners program that I knew didn’t have a prayer from day one, but sure was fun to make fun of later. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:40 am
" The starkest expression of this view had been stated by Judge Jerome Frank in the Eastern Wine Case of 1943. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm
In granting ConTeyor summary judgment of noninfringement, the court relied upon that earlier decision on invalidity for the meaning of the term "coupled to. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm by Jim Hodgson
  Indeed, unnecessarily going beyond even the two Supreme Court decisions (Central Bank in 1994 and Stoneridge in 2008) that the lower court noted were ripe for legislative re-examination, the panel granted complete immunity from lawsuits to all those who knowingly engage in securities fraud unless they are publicly identified or publicly participate in the wrongdoing,” explained Ira Schochet, Esq., NASCAT’s President. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:44 am by law shucks
 This time the judge grants it! [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:16 am by John H. Simpson
Because these orders are almost always sought without notice to the defendant, a plaintiff is required to make “full and frank disclosure” to the court, including the weaknesses in the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Andrea Unterberger is Assistant General Counsel and the Director of CSC Media at Corporation Service Company. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The summary says that the Court granted a declaration against Newham because, in the circumstances of the instant case, they had failed to abide by the law; if there had been frank compliance with administrative procedures and a clear admission from the outset by them, then a declaration would not be necessary; however, they had acted with a lack of candour which was simply not acceptable. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The summary says that the Court granted a declaration against Newham because, in the circumstances of the instant case, they had failed to abide by the law; if there had been frank compliance with administrative procedures and a clear admission from the outset by them, then a declaration would not be necessary; however, they had acted with a lack of candour which was simply not acceptable. [read post]