Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 16,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm
Earlier litigation over German v Dutch Bavaria beers here Bavaria Babes here Bavaria's favourite beer celebration here [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Case citation: Vazquez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Francois Mandil to 2 months suspended sentence and €1,000 fine for damaging a genetically modified corn field of Monsanto during a political rally in 2004. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
Allstate scoffs at the $25,000.00 a day fine imposed by the judge and continues to withhold the requested documents. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm
ShareTuesday’s 5-4 ruling in Bittner v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:15 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
The penalty imposed: a fine of $2,400. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:42 am
The appellate court decided to engage in its own analysis, and cited the 11th’s District’s 1997 decision in State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:31 am
We want to congratulate the fine attorneys who litigated this case in particular Mark Touby and Richard Sicking. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 6:48 am
Humphries faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000.00 fine for each count. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:48 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:03 am
Additional Resources: Texas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:47 am
...VÃÂa La Barbarie me entero de lo que publica hoy "à[read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Which seems fine to Friedman, since although the usual rule is 30 days, because qui tam cases are technically filed on behalf of the government, there's a Ninth Circuit case on point that says the 60-day rule applies, even if the government declines to intervene.Which was, indeed, the law. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
., setting terms of supervised release, community confinement, fines or restitution, or ordering treatment), that it would be difficult for states to administer (i.e., may require bifurcated trials), and that there was no evidence that Oregon’s law reflected a "pernicious manipulation" of Apprendi’s protections. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:46 pm
(para. 28) On 23 December 2005, the appeal was approved by the District Court, who sentenced the applicant to a nominal criminal fine of 1000 Romanian Leu (approximately £160), suspended. [read post]
