Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 3261 - 3280 of 36,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related to the… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am by Beck/Herrmann
Jan. 21, 2009) - the case that held a brand-name drug manufacturer potentially liable for "misrepresentations" even though it did not manufacture the drug that allegedly harmed the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:26 am
Was the court of appeals correct in essentially finding harm per se based solely on a public policy analysis without any meaningful harm analysis? [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Given his acquittal, his presumptively compelled self-incriminating statements produced no harmful effect. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But access is now potentially on both sides of the equation, not just incentives v. access. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  In contrast to certain debates where privacy harms are less well agreed, in this case there are concrete harms. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:43 pm
Courts have a legitimate interest in deterring the type of litigation conduct in which Tresóna engaged, and in compensating those who have been harmed by such conduct. . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:13 pm
Maybe a couple of trees take a hit, but otherwise, no real harm done.Just somewhat unusual. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:35 pm
  This is a good example, I think, of an opinion that many (perhaps most) panels would elect to leave unpublished.Not much harm in publishing, of course. [read post]