Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 3261 - 3280
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
While I’m hopeful that most pieces are around the 400-750 word mark, you can write up to 1700 words. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:43 am
Take a piece of printing paper, clean, white, no markings on it. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:21 am
Sorry about the pun — but then again, I’m not the PTO; then again, too, my attitude toward “scandalous and offensive” ethnic marks is different from that of lots of people, too. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
While this milestone is mind-blowing (at least to me), I am marking this bi-millenium with news of a different kind. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:18 am
Oh, and in case you’re wondering where Gumby’s best pony pal Pokey is, it appears that he doesn’t hold the same status as Gumby, since Pokey’s registrations have lapsed (here and here). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:46 am
Trademark Office wouldn’t consider what font you’re using for your trademark, unless you’re applying for a stylized version. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm
Dole, 709 F.2d 251, 256 (4th Cir.1983)) (internal quotation marks omitted) (applying this standard to co-worker harassment). [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:38 pm
As long-time readers may know, from time-to-time we also cover election law topics, so on this beautiful post-storm and sunny Sunday, so we're going to diverge a bit from our usual subject, because along with our colleague Mark M. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 2:00 pm
I’m sure everyone here has seen the pictures of the kids—as young as five, seven, ten years old—who are part of this migration. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
I also caution against the (very common; I’m sure I’ve done it myself) use of the idea of an “instinctive” sense of unfairness. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:36 am
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:22 pm
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:09 am
These are vital discussions, and as a member of the bar, I’m very glad they’re finally happening with such fervor. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
Res. 400 of the 94th Congress. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
Mark Anderson's post on IP Draughts, "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs: What is the point of IP ministers? [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:23 am
Not having seen either, I’m not sure whether that’s saying much. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
One, the markings can be really obscure, especially at corners or crossings. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Jarvis, of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, has consented to my re-posting this article discussing the USPTO's recent report on its pilot study regarding post-registration proof of use - a study intended to "Assess the accuracy and integrity of the trademark register as to the actual use of the mark with the goods and/or services identified in the registration. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:02 pm
“We’re not letting the industry off the hook. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:57 pm
And so if you're going to then get careless, my friend, I have no sympathy for you at that point. [read post]
