Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 3261 - 3280 of 5,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am by Eric
Perfect 10 alleged a California unfair competition (UCL) violation because (1) Giganews didn't purchase the publicity rights of the models while Perfect 10 did, and (2) trademark infringement and dilution. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
If no triable issue as to anymaterial fact exists, the [moving party] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am by Jeralyn
Matthews, 16 M.J. 354, 368 (CMA 1983); Art. 55, UCMJ, 10 USC § 855. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:44 am by Joshua D. Sarnoff
Under that section, subsection (a)(1)(B), the FTC can “prescribe … rules which define with specificity acts or practices which are unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
His response was “Rule 1, which requires flexibility by court”. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer available including: Group Health Plans & Insurer To Get More Time To Meet Affordable Care Act Summary of Benefits and Coverage Requirements CMS Final Medicare Rule Imposes Many Conditions On Access To Medicare Claims Data To Evaluate Providers & Suppliers OSHA Updates Safety Resources To Prevent Construction, Other “Top 10? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Infringement of 734 Like the 711 patent, the infringement of the 734 patent was also alleged on a quia timet basis but because this patent did not possess the all vital "passenger support element", Claims 1 and 10 would be infringed by the sale of the Solar Eclipse seat. [read post]