Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 10,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 3:21 pm
2. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:July 11, 2024 CV-24-0019 [*1]In the Matter of Andrew P. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:July 11, 2024 CV-24-0019 [*1]In the Matter of Andrew P. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:22 am
John Jackson isn’t facing any time behind bars even if a jury does find that he committed prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
As it originally emerged, the doctrine appeared to be only a rule of statutory construction that carved out an exception from the Chevron doctrine.[10] In Justice Scalia’s colorful words, Congress explains its major policy choices and “does not … hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:24 am
”[3]I hope this suffices to entice the reader to consider Cottingham’s brief on behalf of the primary importance of spiritual praxis, one that does not, as with fideism, ignore, downplay, or even wholly displace the cognitive dimension of religion, but attempts rather to simply remove it from its pride of place in the philosophical study of religion. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
G.S. 14-223 makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to (1) willfully and unlawfully (2) resist, delay, or obstruct (3) a public officer (4) knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the person is a public officer (5) while the public officer is discharging or attempting to discharge a duty of his or her office. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
G.S. 14-223 makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to (1) willfully and unlawfully (2) resist, delay, or obstruct (3) a public officer (4) knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the person is a public officer (5) while the public officer is discharging or attempting to discharge a duty of his or her office. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation Loughborough University Communication Research Centre has produced four reports on Media coverage of the 2015: these can be found here, Report 1; Report 2; Report 3 and Report 4. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost, Justice Donovan, and Justice Wise 309 OPINION John Donovan, Justice. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
" Orascom and Natgasoline filed a response asserting that appellate jurisdiction exists because this case involves (1) an appeal from a final judgment; or (2) a statutorily authorized interlocutory appeal; or (3) a mandamus proceeding. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Section 2(c) is not limited in scope to full names, but encompasses "surnames, shortened names, nicknames, etc., so long as the name in question does, in fact, 'identify' a particular living individual. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:11 am
They are too busy attending the parades, boat races, bed races, human races, rodent races, waitress races, concerts, parties, bowling matches, volleyball games, celebrity sightings and the myriad of other events that make Derby Week (which is now actually about 2 1/2 weeks) one of America's best parties. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:13 am
In addition to the streaming sites that hosted the event, the lawsuit also targets 100 “John Doe” defendants that are accused of participating in the infringement. 2: Judge Approves Eminem Publisher’s Copyright Infringement Case Against Harry Fox & Spotify Next up today, Navjosh at HipHop-N-More writes that a judge is allowing a lawsuit filed by Eminem’s publisher, Eight Mile Style, against both the Harry Fox Agency and Spotify over… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm
Whether the district court properly admitted the testimony of FBI Agent John Kavanaugh. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
March 1, 2011). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am
pp. 199-210(12), Grey, Siobhan Does the Open Justice Principle Require Cameras to be Permitted in the Courtroom and the Broadcasting of Legal Proceedings? [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 8:37 am
Judge Lamberth will have a hearing on the government’s motion today at 1:00. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm
This statutory restriction does not bar behind the scenes advice to a client. 18 U.S.C. 207(c)(1), which imposes a one-year prohibition on communications by former senior Executive Branch officials to their former department when those communications are knowingly made with the intent to influence the department ‘in connection with any matter on which such persons seeks official action by any officer or employee of such department. [read post]
