Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 40,609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2023, 7:06 am
Whether investing heavily in large AI models is financially viable. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Is this case, Cave v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:25 pm
The issue in QBE Syndicate 1036 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:57 pm
Balisteri v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
Alderman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm
In Innovative Health LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
In Spencer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Owusu v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:28 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
Three months after tire maker Continental gave up on its meritless federal lawsuit against Avanci and some of its licensors, particularly Nokia, its Delaware case under state contract law largely survived Nokia's motion to dismiss. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:28 am
” The matter is ADASA Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:52 am
Discovery errors lead to a large number of legal malpractice claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
The post The Strange Case of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Small numbers; Black plaintiffs are largely elite musicians. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
As part of its outreach plan, the Business and Human Rights Working Group is seeking input from a variety of sectors. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
While an agency may not "evade the broad disclosure provisions of FOIL by merely asserting that compliance could potentially require the review of [a large volume] of records" (Matter of Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo v New York State Div. of State Police, 218 AD2d 494, 499 [3d Dept 1996]), we note that the record concerning this issue is not sufficiently developed, in that it does not demonstrate how many troopers' files would need to be searched or the particular… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
While an agency may not "evade the broad disclosure provisions of FOIL by merely asserting that compliance could potentially require the review of [a large volume] of records" (Matter of Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo v New York State Div. of State Police, 218 AD2d 494, 499 [3d Dept 1996]), we note that the record concerning this issue is not sufficiently developed, in that it does not demonstrate how many troopers' files would need to be searched or the particular… [read post]