Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 6,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
(See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Davis (Northeastern) and Prof. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v Davis, 13… [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
My view is that – as well as being a very good judgment – the decision of Lord Justice Davis is one that actually should be endorsed by those who act for defendants. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
See Davis, 131 S. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
The key case here is the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in the companion cases of Davis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The state court's resolution of this claim represents an unreasonable application of Supreme Court Confrontation Clause jurisprudence, most notably Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
Both arise out of traffic stops for excessive noise -- one in New York City and one in Greenville, Alabama.Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog has this long preview article on Davis v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:20 am
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
Lago Vista Independent School District and Davis v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:09 am
On the panel are James Burling (Pacific Legal Foundation), John Echeverria (Vermont Law School), Richard Frank, University of California, Davis Law School), and Dan Stengle, (Hopping Green & Sams, Petitioner's counsel). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
Davis , 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001). [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 9:07 am
Anderson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
This case also implicated Section 3: the treason indictment against Jefferson Davis. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 8:47 pm
Ganis Part V. [read post]
