Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 6,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 3:02 pm
Piggy Paint * 512(f) Plaintiff Can’t Get Discovery to Back Up His Allegations of Bogus Takedowns–Ouellette v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
Class actions obviate these principles, but substitute in several procedural requirements. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:27 am
While half-measures can lead to litigation, a good customer service initiative and a good dispute resolution process make extortionate class actions that much harder to bring. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:20 pm
Today's post was shared by WSJ Law Blog and comes from blogs.wsj.com When a federal judge refused to sign off on the NFL’s $764 million concussion settlement with retired players earlier this month, both the league and lead plaintiffs’ lawyers portrayed the development as a mere procedural hiccup. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
A class III device goes through the PMA process and enjoys preemption. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:40 am
First, the Court found that, “[t]ying an applicant’s entitlement to disability retirement to his last specific assignment would tend to lead to highly inconsistent results for persons in identical job categories who suffer from identical disabilities. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:40 am
Judge Richard Posner has always been an independent thinker, something he has proven in the last year as, despite his economically conservative credentials (which would lead one to presume a possible defense bias), he authored a number of arguably pro-plaintiff class certification opinions, particularly his twin opinions in the controversial case Butler v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm
Here's a rather lengthy article by the staff writer for Lexis Nexis Workers' Comp. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:33 am
I had the distinct pleasure at an ERISA litigation conference recently of listening to a leading plaintiffs’ lawyer and a leading defense lawyer, who were both representing parties on opposite sides in class actions concerning whether benefit plans were actually church plans for purposes of ERISA, square off over the issue. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Rather Comment k is “premised on the assumption that all products within its scope carry some net benefit (relative to risks) for some class of consumers,” id., and thus doesn’t address the kind of claim the plaintiff advances. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:02 am
Noting that a plaintiff hoping to succeed on a claim of sex stereotyping must show that he fails to act and/or identify with his or her gender, a federal district court in Ohio pointed out that the Sixth Circuit has recognized that this theory of sex stereotyping will succeed “where gender non-conformance is demonstrable through the plaintiff’s appearance or behavior. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
And staff members routinely lead students in Christian prayer.... [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
Understand though that those metrics normally only cover “settlement costs” of securities class actions and derivative actions. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
Understand though that those metrics normally only cover “settlement costs” of securities class actions and derivative actions. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
NERA itself notes with respect to its counting methodology that “different assumptions” than those that NERA used “would likely lead to counts that are directionally similar” but that might “in certain circumstances lead observers to draw a different conclusion about short-term trends in filings. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
NERA itself notes with respect to its counting methodology that “different assumptions” than those that NERA used “would likely lead to counts that are directionally similar” but that might “in certain circumstances lead observers to draw a different conclusion about short-term trends in filings. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
Further, if the Court finds that the Purported Voting Agreement has not been terminated and is binding on the Plaintiff, Plaintiff seeks to have this Court declare that the Purported Voting Agreement will not be binding on any person to whom Plaintiff transfers the shares of Class A Voting stock. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm
Rulings like these invite courts to treat the Internet as a gutter of second-class speech. [read post]
