Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 39,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
Does it take a little more effort? [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
Especially since he says -- quite credibly -- that since he only had eight months on his sentence, there was no way he'd be so stupid as to jeopardize that status for a little weed.Which makes sense. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Because, amongst other consequence, a certificate of rehabilitation relieves them from the lifetime requirement of registering as a sex offender.But California law has a neat little twist. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
Just scare her a little bit. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:01 pm
Or a nice little short one that's pretty simple? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
But too much of that gets your really good jury verdict reversed.Case in point.There are lots of tiny little evidentiary errors here. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
And, as if that wasn't enough, the Ninth Circuit's opinion drops this little nugget in a footnote on page seven: "Hours after murdering Officer Martin, Martinez robbed a convenience store in Blythe, California, and fatally shot the store clerk. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:44 pm
And my guess is that ninety percent of more of those opinions come to precisely that conclusion, and just gussy up the law a little bit.That's not only the relevant law these days, but it's a principle that the judiciary is fairly eager to apply in cases like the one today. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 1:27 pm
Little did she know that, two days later, death would indeed follow.Voodoo? [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
It's a FEHA case, and plaintiff obtains a judgment at trial for a little over $130,000. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:06 am
"Maybe Uber and Lyft drivers are a little bit more protected, since you the identity of the person who calls for the ride is (allegedly) discoverable. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:07 am
” I’m a little surprised the court didn’t discuss Lukis v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Twombly v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:43 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Religious differences and child custody: TC v Italy" in Law & Religion UK, 20 May 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/05/20/religious-differences-and-child-custody-tc-v-italy/ [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:15 pm
Thus, while there's no "state action" entry on Wikipedia, there is a "state actor" entry which captures the concept, if briefly, and a short but basically accurate entry for Joseph Story.Neither Wex nor Wikilaw has been in existence long enough to declare either a failure, but their experience thus far suggests that publishers of legal treatises and the like have little to fear from competition from wiki's. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Boschma v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:30 pm
" Gonzales v. [read post]
