Search for: "London v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
If does, it will be the first High Court libel jury trial in London since Desmond v Bower in July 2009. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
The case is Bruce McCandless v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
The topic is my work on Kelo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
The nearly-annual IP Publishers and Editors Lunch, which the recession nearly killed off last year, is back again this year, thanks to the generous hospitality of the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Zurich American Insurance Company et. al v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:22 am
Winfrey v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:58 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am
David Canton has a column in this week’s London Free Press, where he discusses the Conrad Black case: The case deals with Internet defamation and how to determine where to sue for it. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
Section 6(3) states that it is immaterial whether a belief is justified or not if it is honestly held. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
Mike Dorf recaps an ABA webinar on last Term’s animal cruelty “crush video” case, United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:52 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, C.A. [read post]
