Search for: "M J.1." Results 3261 - 3280 of 9,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
ALSO: Trump has some new tweets (1, 2, 3):I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 9:21 am by Mark Tushnet
J. 1553 (1974). [3] Another connection to the indeterminacy thesis, I suppose. [4] 20 Stan. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
  Its difficult to tell without the draft order actually in front of her, but the summary seems to be as follows: (1)the issues for retrial will be Interflora's claim for infringement under section 10(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994; (2)  the case will be heard before a different judge of the Chancery Division; (3) directions for the retrial will be given by the judge of the Chancery Division; (4) on costs, pre-trial and trial costs have been reserved to the… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:30 pm
Ultimately, a clear-eyed, balanced understanding of what observers sometimes call “the China challenge” is crucial for formulating an effective U.S. response.Moderator: Shannon Tiezzi  (The Diplomat)Speakers:Thomas J. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:16 pm by Michael Sweig, JD
I'm in Los Angeles preparing to moderate a panel at the California Wellness Foundation's Violence Prevention Conference. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
O presidente do CNJ também chamou a atenção para a participação dos tribunais fluminenses – Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro (TJ-RJ), Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 1ª Região (TRT-1) e Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região (TRF-2). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:06 pm by fboyer
Aujourd’hui, Rhode Island a besoin de médecins aussi  le Ministère d’Etat à la Santé Publique a-t-il mis en place le programme de dispense de visa J-1(Visa Waiver) pour cette profession afin qu’un patricien étranger puisse entrer aux US ou rester y travailler une fois ses études terminées. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 8:28 am by Florian Mueller
Avanci, which Chief Judge Barbara Lynn (Northern District of Texas) threw out based on a lack of antitrust standing as well as the legal deficiencies of the automotive supplier's Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 claims (to which the Fifth Circuit then added that Conti even lacked basic Article III standing--the ultimate shortcut). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]