Search for: "MCDONALD " Results 3261 - 3280 of 9,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 9:27 am by Dane Johnson
A New Mexico jury returned a verdict against McDonald’s with compensatory damages of $200,000. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:15 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
from McDonald Hopkins: McDonald Hopkins offers a summary of the tax legislation signed into law by Florida's governor, most of which take effect on July 1st. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:42 pm by Ted Frank
Tags: Canada, eat drink and be merry, failure to warn, hot coffee Related posts Urban legends and Stella Liebeck and the McDonald's coffee case (23) Stella Liebeck and McDonald's coffee revisited II (3) Responses to comments on yesterday's McDonald's coffee posts (1) McDonald's coffee revisited (10) Hot tea lawsuit has interesting procedural quirk (18) [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:15 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
from McDonald Hopkins: McDonald Hopkins offers a summary of the tax legislation signed into law by Florida's governor, most of which take effect on July 1st. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 3:00 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
*MOUSE PRINT: Burger King McDonald’s While Burger King’s claims are roughly mathematically correct when you compare equal size portions of their Satisfries to McDonald’s regular fries, BK’s claims exaggerate the calorie and fat reductions when you compare the actual sizes of products you can buy in each restaurant. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:33 am by mikedavidson
Though the final amount settled for was far less, McDonalds did eventually lower the temperature of its coffee. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:43 pm
  (See McDonald, Ian, Golden Years: As Boomers Retire, Insurers Aim to Cash In, WSJ Online, June 15, 2007). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by Randy Barnett
One year later, the Due Process challenge was upheld 5–4 in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brimmer, decided today by the Iowa Supreme Court, the majority (Justices Dana Oxley, joined by Justices Christopher McDonald, Matthew McDermott, and David May) concluded that defendant's public trial rights were violated by the complete closure of his trial, including the exclusion of his family (here, just his mother): [T]he pandemic is an overriding interest that supports the court's decision to limit the public's access to Brimmer's trial [in April 2021]. [read post]