Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 19,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
As the CJEU held in BMS v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:38 pm
Rivard v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Category: 101 By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor TitleCyberfone Systems, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
D.G.R. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
,United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:29 pm
Varnum v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:19 am
Lucia Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
Vaccine mandates also fall squarely within a State’s police power, see Zucht v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Auth., 118 AD3d 550, 551 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving, Inc. v Seneca Gaming Corp., 99 AD3d 1203, 1204).Because of the retained sovereignty of Indian Nations, the subject matter jurisdiction of state courts “must be predicated on explicit authorization from Congress to address matters of tribal self-government” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 292). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Their ruling could have ripple effects well beyond California: As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have observed at Slate, over a dozen states have laws that are intended to discourage women from having abortions by requiring abortion providers to tell their patients, for example, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer or that abortion increases the risk of suicide. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm
Unfortunately, it appears that Carefusion has not recently reviewed the Anti-Dilution Act set forth in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), which states that a “famous” mark is one that is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
In Champion v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
Ct. 2074, 2083 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Today,as we mark the 57th anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 8, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department MARK C. [read post]
