Search for: "Party City Corporation"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 4,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 12:39 pm
We should be building super-fast trains to connect the country and connect within cities. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
Decision Public Interest Exception In general, a party must be beneficially interested to seek a writ of mandate. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:51 am
Since the U.S. was accustomed to fighting other nation-states -- geopolitical entities containing such identifiable targets as capital cities, airports, military bases, and munitions plants -- we would have to find a nation-state to fight, or as Rumsfeld put it, a “target-rich environment. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
As a general rule, personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation cannot be premised solely upon the forum's contacts with an affiliated corporation. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:32 am
Specifically, the ethics committee opined that high-ranking employees of a represented corporate party cannot be contacted directly without the consent of the company’s attorney or their own personal counsel. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97, 105 (1980) (citing City of Lafayette v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
About NYCEDC New York City Economic Development Corporation is the City's primary vehicle for promoting economic growth in each of the five boroughs. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am
Contrary to the defendant's contention that the legal services were rendered solely to his corporation, the documentary evidence, including the invoices for legal fees incurred and the pleadings in the earlier landlord-tenant litigations, establish that the defendant was an individually named party in those actions who received individualized legal services. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:00 am
First, the DATA bill provides that items reported include name and address of recipient but no requirement that corporate persons identify the beneficial owner nor any parent-subsidiary corporate relationships. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Beximco Pharmaceuticals was not consistent with the intentions of the parties or the commercial goals of Islamic finance. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Beximco Pharmaceuticals was not consistent with the intentions of the parties or the commercial goals of Islamic finance. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
http://t.co/KkqPzor (James Moeskops) The Changing Landscape of Attorney-Client Privilege for Corporate Clients - http://t.co/DAzUo4t (Stephanie Ristvey, Susan Rabinovitz) The Coming Collision of “Free to the Public Cloud Storage” and eDiscovery - http://tinyurl.com/5wlv47t (Bill Tolson) The Future of eDiscovery Sanctions - http://t.co/RlJ6Uuz (Chris Wilen) The State of Litigation Management: Here Comes the Money – http://tinyurl.com/3nkhjc3 (David Snow) Thoughts on… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
Wealthy individuals and corporates are often able to suppress all negative content about themselves – except where it remains on the site of a reputable traditional media outlet or other publisher who cannot benefit from intermediary defences. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm
In 2009, Judge Shafer of the Supreme Court, New York County ruled in favor of the non-profit corporation, Stray from the Heart, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
In 2009, Judge Shafer of the Supreme Court, New York County ruled in favor of the non-profit corporation, Stray from the Heart, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Parties to a marriage. 1. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
Bingham McHale Managing Partner Toby McClamroch is visiting China as part of the trade delegation led by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
" Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (10th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionRespondents' supplemental briefPetitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the National Congress of American IndiansPetitioner's replyCVSG Information:Invited: February 22, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: City of New York v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:39 am
Rather, judges are confined by a record comprising the evidence the parties present. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:46 am
If no such prohibition exists, the court must determine if the parties in fact agreed to arbitrate the particular dispute by examining their collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
