Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick" Results 3261 - 3280 of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Patrick Goold, IP Law and the Bundle of Torts Patent infringement as a tort? [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
However, several factors combine to tilt him away from taking this approach alone: these include (i) the sheer complexity of the mechanisms for operating the proposed system which will be as hard to amend and fine-tune as it has been to establish in the first place, (ii) its plainly divisive nature, (iii) the absurdly convoluted structure for litigating unitary patents and matters relating to them, (iv) the fact that the realities relating to the satisfactory governance of the European Patent Office… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The Administration's response comes after months of speeches by candidates for the Republican Presidential nomination, including Patrick J. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]