Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 3261 - 3280 of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
” (p.16, quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
As I said, this is something that bears on the arguments of both self-defense enthusiasts and self-defense skeptics. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Bear in mind that in 2012 there was no doubt in the mind of anyone paying attention that President Obama would carry California and get all its electoral votes. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Investors, the people with the most to lose, have had and will continue to have a limited voice in shaping the CAT’s operations, reach, and costs. [read post]