Search for: "People v. James" Results 3261 - 3280 of 4,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Ken Kersch
All of American history, he, in effect, argued, had been a (politicized) distortion wrought by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, in favor of states rights and enumerated powers. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by admin
”  As Justice Scalia elaborated in his dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:36 am by Nick Cowen
Most people have benefited from having a Facebook account, looking for jobs on LinkedIn, and despite its futility, spending too much time on YouTube. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
”  Neither the statute nor the Supreme Court have defined the term or who may invoke it, but in NBC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
People were being laid off left and right. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
However, there has been little overall movement in the polls, even though 67 million people were watching. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
“Trump Prepares to Offer Clemency to More Than 100 People in His Final Hours in Office,” reported yesterday’s Washington Post. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
" The Federalist No. 51, at 349 (James Madi-son) (Jacob E. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Because it allows people to -gasp- criticize people like them aloud. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
That statement led both Adam Wagner and James Wilson (for HLE) to write on the subject. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Chambers and his founding partners, James E. [read post]