Search for: "People v. New"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 41,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2016, 2:06 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 2:06 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
JH
Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice
Issuance of Illinois Driver's License Poses No Legal Impediment to Prosecution of Offenses Charged
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:34 am
VanderKooi and Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:57 am
The Texas Legislature is in session right now and one thing that is being considered by the lawmakers this year is a new law proposed by Representative Harold V. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 10:10 am
Schmid More Blog Entries: Snaras v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
Yesterday the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Ice TV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd, bringing to an end legal proceedings that have been going on for the past three years. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:03 pm
Several outbreaks were reported and at least 180 people have been sick with vomiting and diarrhea after eating oysters from France in late December and on New Year’s Eve, according to Statens Serum Institut. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:57 pm
See, e.g., Matthews v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am
According to Professor Wegner, yesterday, "at the opening of the oral hearing in the Zhejiang High People's Court in Chint v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:38 am
Ansanelli
Subscription Required
APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTCriminal Practice
'Anthrax' Note Admission Not Suppressed; In-Prison Interview Not Custodial Interrogation Under 'Alls'
People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
Their crimes are harder to detect, it depends on the type of sex offender we're talking about (drunk one-timer v. sociopath, for example), and many of them recidivate not with new sex offenses but with non-sex crimes. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am
Casey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:02 pm
New Article: Torie Atkinson, A Fine Scheme: How Municipal Fines Become Crushing Debt in the Shadow of the New Debtors’ Prison, 51 Harv. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm
Yazzie et al. v. [read post]
