Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 4,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
As Olesya Khromenyuk, a Ukrainian historian, explained in the New York Times last year, most people “didn’t imagine Ukraine at all” before February 2022 and many still conjure up “caricatures based not on knowledge of the country or the people who inhabit it but on mythology. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:19 pm
From Miller v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm
In the present case, the mere passing of time did not render the information irrelevant and as Ms. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
McKenzie, No. 07-1834 Sentence of forty-two months' imprisonment for distribution of cocaine base is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) district court incorrectly assigned two points to her Criminal History Category (CHC) score, thus rendering her ineligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(f); and 2) district court improperly credited computerized docket reports showing her past convictions. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:52 am
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
The effect is to render the members of the court all but anonymous. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:35 pm
Many lawyers believed the use of a phone in rendering legal services was unprofessional and, of course, unethical. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
In the November 7 oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
Moreover, it is of course the case that CSLI has no connection at all to the reason people use cellular telephones. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:43 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
Supreme Court made clear in Riley v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:09 pm
Champion v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:57 pm
This aspect of the book represents considerable added value and clearly required an enormous amount of hard work on the part of the many people at Mr. [read post]
