Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
This case also has serious statute of limitations problems, and it seems unlikely that a court considering class certification really could conclude that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) could be satisfied in a case where the sexual ab [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
In Wright v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
When the taxpayer appealed, the Superior Court affirmed the Commissioner's decision, and the taxpayer again appealed. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:46 am
New Jersey Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson ruled on Friday, February 6, that her court would exercise jurisdiction over a petition seeking a divorce from a Canadian same-sex marriage. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:00 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Not one, not two, but three judges in San Francisco Superior Court either recused themselves or were asked to step aside by counsel on Wednesday during a hearing in a case over bar exam data. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:30 am
Superior Court, 80 Cal. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:29 pm
The dispute in Turnage v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The majority opinion drew a sharp dissent, and it will either be appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, or go back to the Maricopa County, Arizona Superior Court for further proceedings (or, of course, it may be settled).Is this type of case just an "informed consent" case: i.e., if the "informed consent" had been broader, there would be no viable claims? [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
Tire Stores Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:37 pm
The case is Crawford v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:51 am
Weissman argued that for nearly a century, judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers had misconstrued a 1909 Supreme Court decision, called New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Specifically as to inadequate warning claims the court in Anderson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Appeals Court sent the case back to Hampden Superior Court for the hearing. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
It was a triple failure of our government and our people and an everlasting stain on FDR, on the leading Congressmen of the time and on those Justices who voted in the majority in Hirabayashi and Korematsu. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 761. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:17 am
Superior Court, supra (quoting Strassheim v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 4:57 pm
On December 19, 2008, in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
