Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 3,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Matter of Medical Society of the State of N.Y. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:02 am
Applying the public policy exception in a judicial review arbitration awardsMatter of Amalgamated Transit Union v MTA Bus Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 30877(U), April 16, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 115102/08, Judge: O. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Katz Technology Licensing drops Covington & Burling as counsel (Law 360) Economic downturn = downturn in patent filings (PatentlyO) Challenging the strong presumption of patent validity (PatentlyO) USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions Jury awards Uniloc $388m in patent suit v Microsoft (Law 360) (IP Down Under) CAFC finds for Honda in defending truck bed patent suit by… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
In a comment to my earlier post on this subject, Peter states that "'Forced' patriotism is a contradiction in terms. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
Peter Rost. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
/**/ A one million dollar punitive damages award was affirmed by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in Peters v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
(Interestingly, Blomquist does include Lochner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
But mere vulnerability does not negate our free will. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
But mere vulnerability does not negate our free will. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
But mere vulnerability does not negate our free will. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
Malone and State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
My take, however, is that this is a reasonably simple case and that looking at the four corners of the indictment, it does allege a crime, and quite frankly, a crime that goes to the heart of having a fair and impartial judiciary. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
ParrisCitation: 2009 WY 44Docket Number: S-08-0247; S-08-0248Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Peter G. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 10:05 am
In Doe v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, (NY Ct. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP:… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:19 pm
See Weld v. [read post]
