Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 17,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
United States v. de Perez, No. 07-CR-361-1 (JBW), 2007 WL 3010587 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
This is stated in the statute. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
That was what happened in Carbajal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
" According to the article, state drug lab chemist Annie Dookhan has been charged with two counts of obstruction of justice, for falsifying drug test results and for falsifying her academic record. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:23 pm
According to our Head Count post, the Arizona Court of Appeals has followed the learned intermediary rule three times: Piper v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:48 am
Case Name: DANIEL RAY BOWLSBY v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” Case citation: Mahoney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 9:33 pm
The Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:13 am
Seventh Circuit agrees that web posts were inadmissible unless authenticated, among other challenges to the Internet evidence, in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
In the case of Malaker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
It grew more complex as an array of state and non-state actors took sides in Assad’s civil war and terrorist groups also began vying for territory and control. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
Seriously, eight years after Bush v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
In some ways, however, R. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
The Court held that "the Association's liability under Count II being vicarious to Dr. [read post]
