Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 3261 - 3280
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 7:32 pm
Supreme Court’s consideration of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
Lynd v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
”; Also Oil States issues) C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Ill.S.Ct.R. 201(b)(1); R. 213(c), (d); R. 214(c). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am
R. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
The French court of appeal cancelled the French marks and assigned the name domain « France.com » to the State of France. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 5:50 am
Issues related to what has been called the “right to be forgotten” have been debated, at least since the ground breaking decision of the European Court of Justice in Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Protecciób de Datos, Mario Costeja González, C-131/12 [2014], CURIA. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
The GOP “is only sabotaging itself by allowing Trump to draft this C-list roster,” as Matthew Yglesias pointed out at the time. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
” As for the final piece of the contextual puzzle, the CCR’s motion points out “President Trump’s [r]efusal to [r]elease [p]etitioners [d]uring [h]is [p]residency. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
” As for the final piece of the contextual puzzle, the CCR’s motion points out “President Trump’s [r]efusal to [r]elease [p]etitioners [d]uring [h]is [p]residency. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC… [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:22 am
Penal Code § 502(c)(2). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
R. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:08 am
Accordingly, the complaint, insofar as asserted by them, was a nullity, and the action as to them was improperly commenced (see Hilton Apothecary v State of New York, 89 NY2d 1024 [1997]; Boente v Peter C. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 9:57 am
Cherry v LB Tower Hamlets. [read post]
