Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 12,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court in Renico v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
This one seems to have good chances of a grant. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am
See, e.g., Pollack v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 12:27 pm
Thirteen months ago, State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:38 am
Supreme Court ruling in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:08 am
To the contrary, Nixon v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
See Bazemore v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
Gannon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Pirani v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
Five-and-a-bit months after the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published in Case C-125/14, [here, with Katnote here] in Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered its decision, in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék (the Budapest Municipal Court).The facts of the underlying dispute are as follows. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) Last in our series of updates is Boolen v Barking & Dagenham. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am
Recognizing, no doubt, that there is no chance whatsoever that the ERA, if approved by Congress today, a far-fetched notion, would receive the approval of three-quarters of the states, they argue that it should be deemed approved by glossing over the insurmountable argument that, by its own terms, it failed to achieve approval. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:12 am
” Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:54 pm
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Lee v. [read post]
