Search for: "State v. English" Results 3261 - 3280 of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Marta Requejo
  Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The English approach, though, is not without its problems. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nor did Lord Malcom, who did not consider it “necessary to dwell” on the current state of the law concerning whether such a right existed. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:20 am by christopher
Happy he was able to stay in California and write and release his July 8, 2010 opinion in _______ LOVE v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm by Brian Scott
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]