Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania explained in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Defendants then sought the same relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:12 am
In Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 6:18 am
Colorado River abstention was found to be appropriate in a case decided in April by the District Court for the District of New Mexico. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed, that SeaWorld had violated OSHA’s general duty-clause. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
Case Background In Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 10:14 am
Supreme Court’s in TC Heartland v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:59 am
A few federal district courts have equated common-law immunity with lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (see the 2017 case Lewis v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:17 am
The District Court denied the motion. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in the Khoja v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Circuit, instead of in a district court first—to address standing. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
First, trial courts cannot simply dismiss cases without allowing the parties an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am
District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, in Hausman v Green, No. 3:18-CV-03013 [July 20, 2018]. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
Kleinfeld said in his 2-1 majority opinion that his court agreed with a district court ruling. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
The trial was to be short, the parties and the district court were ready, and the case presented no issues of special state court expertise, nor any novel questions of state law. [read post]
