Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:21 pm
Now, he finally is a green card holder. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
To retain a role for a political office holder in warrants such as these, and against the recommendations of the RUSI and Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation reports appears disproportionate. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
A different panel heard argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy The Bankruptcy Code (title 11 of the United States Code) is divided up into chapters. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:15 am
1188; Korea Data Systems Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:15 am
1188; Korea Data Systems Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
Holder – no state or local government is currently required to obtain preclearance at all. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:46 am
Further, it will be interesting to see how state trademarks in this sphere are enforced around potential areas of federal law crossover (stay tuned for The Mary Jane Group v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive requires Member States to "ensure that right holders are in a position to apply for an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe a copyright or related right. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
Moreover, the California decision may be an outlier (or it could be overturned on appeal), as the DC decision is far more consistent with cases like WPIX v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
(See for example, MDG Computers Canada Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm
The Factum states, 25. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
Until 2013, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in a case called Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
Rather, an account holder must be considered an infringer, at minimum, when the service provider has actual knowledge that the account holder is using its services for infringing purposes. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Holder case in 2013) to be outdated and thus unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
