Search for: "State v. Jones" Results 3261 - 3280 of 6,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
Indeed, as the Court of Appeal in the San Angelo case pointed out, the resulting approach which the Court took in 1909 was indistinguishable from the later "neutral principles" approach of Jones v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Jones, the court has no jurisdiction” is no more valid than one that says “In Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
The Court of Appeal rejected what it considered to be a suggestion by the appellants that there should effectively be a re-hearing of the issue of whether the discrimination was justified given that the right to appeal was on a point of law only under s.13(1), Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, noting the Supreme Court’s guidance on the dividing line between law and fact in R(Jones) v First-tier tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 (citing paragraph 16 of Jones). [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:27 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Jones and Chido DunnInternational Cocoa Agreement, with introductory note by Kathryn Khamsi [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Douglas and Lewis Powell;    Major cases, including Jones v. [read post]