Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 19,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:06 am
Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
On 28 January 2015 in Case R 2425/2013-4 Chronopost v DHL Express (France), the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) annulled a decision of the Cancellation Division which had upheld an action filed by DHL for cancellation of Chronopost's 2003 Community trade mark (CTM) WEBSHIPPING. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
In the United States, there would be little protection against look-alike cantilever chairs if it is plain that what has been emulated is the idea -- which is not protected at all by copyright.Regarding levels of abstraction, should one compare an allegedly infringing use with a trade mark as registered, with the trade mark as used, or on any other basis? [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
As the CJEU held in BMS v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:38 pm
Rivard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
D.G.R. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Category: 101 By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor TitleCyberfone Systems, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
,United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:19 am
Lucia Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:29 pm
Varnum v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
Vaccine mandates also fall squarely within a State’s police power, see Zucht v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Auth., 118 AD3d 550, 551 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving, Inc. v Seneca Gaming Corp., 99 AD3d 1203, 1204).Because of the retained sovereignty of Indian Nations, the subject matter jurisdiction of state courts “must be predicated on explicit authorization from Congress to address matters of tribal self-government” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 292). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Their ruling could have ripple effects well beyond California: As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have observed at Slate, over a dozen states have laws that are intended to discourage women from having abortions by requiring abortion providers to tell their patients, for example, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer or that abortion increases the risk of suicide. [read post]
