Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 3261 - 3280 of 71,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am by Adam Wagner
This was because the result of the hearing would not have a substantial influence on the secretary of states decision whether to place the man on the list of people barred from working with children. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am by Adam Wagner
Condliff, R (on the application of) v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 910 – Read judgment A morbidly obese man has lost his appeal against his local Primary Care Trust’s (PCT’s) refusal to fund his anti-obesity surgery. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He stated that in the present case it was accepted that the council’s screening exercise in April 2010 was legally defective as the pollution prevention measures had not been fully identified at that point, so the council could not be satisfied that mitigation measures would prevent a risk of pollutants entering the river. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
The Holy Roman Empire (Latin: Sacrum Romanum Imperium; German: Heiliges Römisches Reich, later: Heiliges Römisches Reich deutscher Nation) was one of the largest, most successful and longest-lasting political entities in Europe. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Some readers have asked me about the oral argument schedule in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:46 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:42 am by Dennis Crouch
In two pending petitions for en-banc consideration of the R.36 Issue, the court has requested responsive briefing: Leak Surveys, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:31 am
The most interesting case being, R. v. [read post]