Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 3261 - 3280 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Chuck Cosson
In Carpenter, Petitioner ACLU argues that the “degree of invasiveness of the surveillance” involved distinguishes this case from prior precedent holding there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in records held by third-parties such as banks or phone companies.[18]  The government, respondent, argues inter alia that changes in technology are not relevant, because a reasonable expectation of privacy cannot attach to 3rd party business records created by that 3rd party… [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Autumn Callan
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] came to the US from South Korea in 1982 and found success as a businessman. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:49 am
That would require the Committee to consider--dispassionately and rigorously, the political and legal consequences of such actions if undertaken in equivalent circumstances in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:03 am by Howard Friedman
Adducci, (ED MI, June 22, 2017), the court described the claims raised:Petitioners state that because of their having resided in the United States and their status as religious minorities – many are Christian, others are members of oppressed Muslim sects – they are likely to be persecuted, tortured, or killed by members of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, the de facto government in many parts of Iraq. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:16 am by Holland & Hart
The NLRB Left To Go It Alone When the United States filed its brief with the Supreme Court last week changing positions, it did so as a “friend of the court. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7806  Issues: (1) Whether the petitioner should have been sentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010; and (2) Whether the court of appeals offered an insufficient explanation for denying the petitioner a certificate of appealability. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by John Floyd
  These terms were important to Cosino’s status in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:15 am by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
Our law firm often works with foreign national whose work is in the national interest of the United States. [read post]