Search for: "True v True" Results 3261 - 3280 of 33,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly found that the Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded causes of action alleging negligence, gross negligence, and negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and direction, citing Moskowitz v Masliansky, 198 AD3d 637 and other decisions. * The Appellate Division noted "[c]auses of action alleging negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision are not statutorily required to be pleaded with specificity". [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am by Chip Merlin
” My first true job and business was teaching others how to sail at the St. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
Plaintiff will set forth the true names and capacities of the fictitiously named Doe Defendants together with appropriate specific charging allegations when ascertained. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:45 am by Chip Merlin
This is especially true with foreign insurers where an arbitration provision will apply. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:13 am by Neil Wilkof
True, this decision treats NFTs as a “format” in terms of infringement issues, and it did not elaborate on the technical features of NFTs. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 2:28 pm by Tom Smith
Of course, if the most likely explanation is true, that a left-wing clerk was trying to shame one of the members of the majority to pull back from overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 10:33 am
Perhaps it was true of some people in that generation, but certainly it wasn’t true of the people that I knew. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
” Whether a former president should ever have the unilateral power to assert executive privilege over the objection of the incumbent remains an unsettled issue, as the Supreme Court recently recognized in Trump v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
With respect to variance and random error, Gelbach tells us that any evidence that generates a LR > 1, should be admitted when “the statistical evidence is statistically significant below the 50 percent level, which will be true when the p-value is less than 0.5. [read post]