Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 6,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
United States as though it alleged knowing use of perjury, when it actually alleged withholding exculpatory evidence, warrants reversal. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
United States (taxation of gaming proceeds) Northern Arapaho Tribe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
In Llorca v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The 2006 Amendments to the Voting Rights Act passed the United States Senate by a vote of 98-0 and passed the House 390-33, but there was more intrigue than the lopsided numbers suggest. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 1:14 pm
United States, 484 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 2007). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 9:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
’ United States v Holman, 314 F.3d 837, 840 (7th Cir.2002). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
In 2021, the Court decided Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:25 am
Posner was appointed by President Reagan and has been called the "greatest living jurist in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 7:01 am
This story from the Hook says the parents in that beer case are appealing to the United States Supreme Court the decision by the Virginia Supreme Court to affirm their convictions for serving alcohol to minors.This somewhat lame article describes an interesting lawsuit now pending in the W.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
”One year later, in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
Nault v Evangelical Lutheran Full.pdf Sponsored Topics: United States - Court - Government - Judicial Branch - Federal Courts [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Unite Here Local 355 and Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:16 am
At The Watch, Radley Balko dissects the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Florida, 18-5228, Grim v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
