Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 3261 - 3280
of 7,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
See Houston Progressive, 474 S.W.3d at 447-48; FD Frontier, 438 S.W.3d at 695; Hou-Scape, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
” See, e.g., Maine Ass’n of Interdependent Neighborhoods, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Hudson Valley is the largest foie gras producer in the United States and markets its foie gras as “the humane choice. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
" The United States District Court for the District of Colorado was faced with just that question in the recently decided Zapien v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Qualcomm, Inc., No. 17-cv-00220-LHK, another case involving FRAND, SEP, and related antitrust issues. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Servs., Inc., 557 U.S. 167," Plaintiff failed to produced evidence warranting a shift in burden under Price Waterhouse.The Circuit Court explained that “[T]o warrant a mixed motive burden shift, the plaintiff must be able to produce a smoking gun or at least a thick cloud of smoke to support his [or her] allegations of discriminatory treatment. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Servs., Inc., 557 U.S. 167," Plaintiff failed to produced evidence warranting a shift in burden under Price Waterhouse.The Circuit Court explained that “[T]o warrant a mixed motive burden shift, the plaintiff must be able to produce a smoking gun or at least a thick cloud of smoke to support his [or her] allegations of discriminatory treatment. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:19 am
Describing the pay policy at issue, the court stated: Gentiva provides home healthcare services to patients throughout the United States[Doc. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:24 am
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
United States Small Bus. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:25 pm
Mark McManaway, et al., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:40 am
Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc. et al. (2007) 149 Cal.App. 4th 285, 290-291 (certified for partial publication). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
City of Detroit[12] and Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:48 am
Nos. 09-2185-cv(L), 10-4111 (Con) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 462 Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm
The case cite is Super Duper, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
" (ellipsis in original) (quoting United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:30 pm
Further complicating the issue is the fact that, in his opinion for the United States Supreme Court in Dist. of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:20 pm
That is not a surprise because outside of the United States, most people refer to antitrust law as competition law. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). [read post]
