Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:48 pm
So there’s no Eldred v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv8435 (S.D.N.Y.); see also Pedersen v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Ritz Camera & Image v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:39 pm
Button; implications of Holder v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am
Therefore, “an injury allegedly inflicted by digital piracy is felt throughout the United States, which necessarily includes New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am
Therefore, “an injury allegedly inflicted by digital piracy is felt throughout the United States, which necessarily includes New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:29 am
NEW YORK—The Justice Department alleged May 3 a wholly owned Deutsche Bank AG subsidiary fraudulently misrepresented its mortgage lending and underwriting practices for years while participating in a federal mortgage-insurance program that to date has led to $386 million in losses (United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
In King v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
The real story is less exciting, but nonetheless not devoid of interest: "President of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys Alasdair Poore has praised the Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for his readiness to listen to international users of the American IP system. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:13 am
., et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
§ 601(g)–that he live in the United States for at least five years between the ages of 13 and 21. [read post]
