Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3261 - 3280 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
 Ben Challis, writing on the 1709 Blog, reports a not entirely unsurprising but nonetheless significant ruling from the United States that a download is not a performance for the purposes of copyright law. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am by Amy Howe
At Opinio Juris, William Dodge discusses Cardona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
The GDPR is an EU regulation that seeks to protect the privacy of EU citizens' personal data by limiting transfer of such information among EU member states as well as between EU countries and the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
In effect, the Proposed Regulations say they are reversing the resultin United States v. [read post]