Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 6,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
All the while Maya v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
United States, next term’s case stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey that asks whether a public official defrauds the government of its property when she provides a public-policy reason for an official decision that is not her actual reason, “a conflux of fascinating law and facts. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am
The United States, on the other hand, is correct not tolerate human rights abuses in the United States even if it would be permissible in the home country of the diplomat. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
White asserted that “while in an international sense Porto [sic] Rico was not a foreign country, since it was owned by the United States, it was foreign in a domestic sense, because the island had not been incorporated into the United States, but was merely appurtenant thereto as a possession. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
Constitution, not the states. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:44 pm
Root Consulting Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
For example, in Hurst v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision is Sarhan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
"[5] That may be especially true for minority religious communities' confidence in the secular judiciary, since many minority religions and denominations might have special reasons to distrust the majority's legal system.[6] To be sure, the plaintiff might understandably worry that those coreligionists will resent him for suing, and may shun him or refuse to do business with him. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Attorney General's Office objected, stating that the population makeup of the state (78% white, 20% black, and 1% each Native American and Asian) made a single majority-minority district insufficient. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
Well, it all goes back to a 1986 United States Supreme Court decision, Batson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
Two recent United States District Court Cases, one out of Minnesota, Kay Beer Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
Two recent United States District Court Cases, one out of Minnesota, Kay Beer Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
"And even if the Supreme Court is fixated on Citizens United, a united citizenry might decide to focus on the actual words of the Constitution themselves.The Guarantee Clause says that the United States shall guarantee to the states a republican form of government. [read post]
