Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 3261 - 3280 of 4,493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm by David Lat
If so, how does this differ from Biglaw firms defending, say, Guantanamo Bay detainees who want to bring down the United States? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am by Rhead Enion
 The Court recently struck a federal law that criminalized, among other things, the sale of dogfighting videos (United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Knight.Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:38 am by Theodore Ruger
 Some of these areas have seen a resurgence of illnesses and deaths caused by measles, mumps, and pertussis (whooping cough) – ailments which Paul Offit has called the “diseases of [our] grandparents” since they had been successfully eradicated in the United States for decades. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm by WIMS
Climate Change Negotiator Position Announcement Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   A decision  by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:18 pm by Ryan Radia
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of certain kinds of DUI checkpoints in Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm by Jon
  For example the Department of Justice press release added this statement, “… and to insure a singular monetary system for all purchases and debts in the United States, public and private” to their quote of Article 1, section 8 clause 5 of the US Constitution, when no such law or even idea, exists outside of the hyperbole of the DOJ. [read post]