Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
On the whole, the level of entries was quite painful, since many of the readers either didn't take the trouble to establish what a limerick was, or knew perfectly well what it was but decided to do their own thing, either throwing themselves at the Kats' mercy or growling contemptuously at their petty insistence on there being any rules at all. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 11:07 am
The Court held that "generic.com" marks are not necessarily generic in USPTO v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
But, as I had observed in the aftermath of the Court’s Mayo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
A recent example of this in IP is Lenz v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:53 pm
Today, technical standards enable planes, trains, and automobiles, as well as the smartphones we all depend on. [read post]
Timing and political affiliations may favor FTC in en banc review of panel decision in Qualcomm case
8 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
This is the third post today on FTC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:02 am
They depend on, amongst other things, factors particular to the person tasting the product concerned, such as age, food preferences and consumption habits, as well as on the environment or context in which the product is consumed.Moreover, it is not possible in the current state of scientific development to achieve by technical means a precise and objective identification of the taste of a food product which enables it to be distinguished from the taste of other products of the same… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:16 pm
Diener, 59 AD2d 522 [2d Dept 1977] [excusing five-month delay was an abuse of discretion]; Zelvin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:18 am
Supreme Court issued its first decision of the October 2015 term, OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 2:16 pm
., Tackett v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
This includes last September's Nokia v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 6:19 am
For example, there's a lot of that going on in the Skyhook v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Beyond Retro usethe "V" word too ...The Opposition Division generously upheld the opposition for goods in Classes 18 and 25, but rejected it for the goods in Class 14. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
No. 198 v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:51 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:29 pm
It will follow on the heels of United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
The English courts do them well and more often than you think in the world of IP (which includes confidential information). [read post]
