Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 61,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, in SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, in SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
Brewer and Gagnon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am
The author of the new work would have to contribute “something more than a ‘merely trivial’ variation” (Albert Bell v Catalda Fine Arts), such that it would make the derivative work “distinguishable from the [preexisting] work in some meaningful way” (Schrock v Learning Curve International). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:20 pm
Someone noticed the published opinion, and as a result, the plaintiff was fired from work. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:03 pm
Bank v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
The United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:34 pm
The Guidance follows the recent Full Federal Court (Court) decision in WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 (Rossato),[2] which held that a person cannot be a casual employee where there is a firm advance commitment to on-going work. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:51 pm
In Fernald v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question: Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
In El Paso Independent School District v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
In Gabriele v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 239 A.D.2d 575, the Appellate Division considered the issue.Vincent Gabriele III began working for the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority in 1985. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am
A couple things to note: State Action. [read post]
