Search for: "California Natural Products"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 4,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 6:25 am
Accordingly, Natural Selection recalled all of its spinach products with “use by” dates from August 17 to October 1, 2006. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
Samsung cases in the Northern District of California, is unconvinced of the "causal nexus" really being a hard and fast requirement for permanent injunctive relief. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Mattel, Inc., 518 F.3d) to show dilution ("the whittling away of the value of a trademark when it’s used to identify different products", Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:52 am
Oren has a number of interesting things to say, but his critique has two main points: (1) the conservative bias of midlevel principles; and (2) the fuzzy nature of midlevel principles, a product of their origin in a (hypothetical) consensus-building procedure. (1) The conservative bias: I think there are two senses of "conservative." [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
But there truly are many, many people who have suffered meaningful losses due to an inherently defective product. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
Among other things, Liberty was enjoined from directly or indirectly representing a RAL as an actual refund, and from failing to state conspicuously that the product is a loan and including the name of the lending institution and the fee or interest it will charge. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 8:47 pm
A separate statement released by the FDA noted that the recall is precautionary in nature. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
The District court in the Northern District of California found for Sega, that an infringement had taken place and it “could not be seen as a fair use because of the commercial nature of the reverse engineering. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:51 am
This study was prepared for Plains Exploration & Production Co., an independent oil and gas company, and the Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning, and was conducted by Cardno Entrix, an international environmental and natural resource management consulting firm. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
There is currently a trial expected to begin in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
There is currently a trial expected to begin in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Isaacs' criminal defense attorney argued that despite the horrific nature of the videos that they are protected speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
However the court ruled that the Board had failed to address the third element of the California Innovations test: the materiality of the geographic representation inherent in the mark. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:25 pm
Proposition 37, a California ballot initiative to require labeling of all GM foods, was defeated last November by about 6.5 percentage points. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Such disincentive is the necessary byproduct of divorcing product liability from product manufacturing. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:36 am
On December 10, 2012, a California jury returned a verdict of $169 million in a case brought by the FDIC against three former IndyMac Bancorp Inc. executives after determining that those officers were negligent in making loans to homebuilders by continuing to push for growth in loan production without proper regard for creditworthiness and market conditions. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
These issues include the way an employer can reasonably limit pre-certification production of information, including information that is not wholly relevant to class certification issues and/or overly burdensome, like production of information related to 418 Wal-Mart stores during a lengthy period of time. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
California’s ban on false or misleading labeling was identical to the FDCA/FDA requirements. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:49 am
Schmitz allegedly confronted Lawler about her manner of dress, her failure to have the company's newest eyewear products on display, and the way repair parts were being stored. [read post]
