Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 3281 - 3300 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 9:40 am by Guest Author
The court had previously issued temporary restraining orders barring release of pre-2019 records pending full consideration on the merits of the petitions. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:02 am by Kristen R. Klesh and Leonard L. Gordon
Because California’s law does not differ from federal law, the plaintiff’s state law claim was not preempted. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in concluding—in direct conflict with Virginia’s highest court and other courts—that a decision of the Supreme Court, Montgomery v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  Conspicuously absent from this portion of the opinion’s discussion is any mention of the legislative intent underlying the 90-day filing and service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1), its plain language stating it applies to bar “all persons” from “any further action or proceeding” after it expires (§ 65009(e)), and its expressly stated intent not to displace shorter statutes of limitations. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am by Eric Goldman
Wayfair case, the Supreme Court opened up the door to states taxing online sales by non-residents. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
The Columbia Law School graduate leaves a legacy as a pioneering lawyer.Also of note, the On Appeals column in The Recorder presents No Error or Abuse of Discretion Required: Opportunities and Risks on Appeal in the State Bar Court.The CLA Litigation Section's Committee on Appellate Courts (the successor to the former State Bar standing committee) has a website up and running now, here.Looking for interesting pure-appellate case law? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: California: L.A. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Garcia, 17-834 Issues: (1) Whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act expressly pre-empts the states from using any information entered on or appended to a federal Form I-9, including common information such as name, date of birth, and social security number, in a prosecution of any person (citizen or alien) when that same, commonly used information also appears in non-IRCA documents, such as state tax forms, leases, and credit applications; and (2) if IRCA bars the… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:13 pm by Ilya Somin
In this July 2018 post, I assessed the initial district court decision in the Trump administration's lawsuit against California's "sanctuary state" policies. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
You are more likely to die of a DUI related crime in Kern County than any other county in the state of California. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Belmora's FLANAXBayer's Section 43(a) claims: The district court found that Bayer's Section 43 claims for unfair competition and false advertising, and its similar claims under California law, were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:25 am by Wesley Shelton
In 2012, the United States Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Valentine’s Day Massacre, the Honorable Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California reconsidered and reversed his November 2018 Blockvest decision, sending a powerful message about the illegality of so-called initial coin offerings. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:17 pm by Nassiri Law
In either case, the lawsuit (also referred to as the “complaint”) is typically filed in state court in the county where the discrimination occurred or in a county relevant to the case (for example, if work was regularly performed there or that is where the company is headquartered). [read post]