Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 5,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
The amounts in dispute rarely get up to $5 million, the IP needs injunctive remedies, and the Chinese party usually does not have assets outside the country. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
So most of the time the award will be between a low percentage of the claim and 100% of the claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions G 9/92 [12] and G 4/93 [1]). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am
Even where the rules are in place, you won't find 100% compliance across an entire industry. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:13 am
Even if Microsoft prevailed 100%, the amount wouldn't be a threat to cash-rich Google. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:44 am
As a subrogee, AXA acts for the injured parties to recoup its own losses sustained from paying out insurance claims. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:25 pm
What Responsibility Does The Employer Have Regarding the SBC? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
For the sake of efficient proceedings and with the approval of the parties the Board has decided to decide itself on this ground within the framework of its powers under A 111(1).As you might have guessed, the requests were found not to comply with A 100(c) / A 123(2) and the appeal was dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
On August 1, the USPTO decided to reexamine various claims of the '172 patent (click on the image to enlarge):The claims undergoing reexamination now are claims 1-6, 8-15, and 17-38. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
This claim does not contain any further limitation. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
., LLC, 2007 WL 3492762 at *1 (N.D. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The patent in suit does not provide sufficiently precise measurement conditions […] nor does it cite the chargeability values obtained for the compounds of the examples.These two parameters are the only features used by the [patent proprietor] for delimiting the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request with respect to the prior art. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
60% ask for willful damages, and 1% get them. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am
Remember that the "victim" does not have an injunction against themeslves! [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Father does not pay. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) Issue #1: TM+50. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
The Call is Free, the Relief can be valuable. 1-877-793-9290 . [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
The Call is Free, the Relief can be valuable. 1-877-793-9290 . [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
– does. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
Does it make sense that they would give up monetary rewards, and then run their nonprofit in a way that lets them get more monetary rewards? [read post]
