Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 6:49 am
" Garfum.com Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:45 am
" Credit Acceptance Corporation v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:27 am
" Genes Industry, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:16 am
Rath v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:09 am
E-Z-GO, et. al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:40 am
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:13 pm
In County of Orange v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 4:36 pm
ATTORNEY'S FEES, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SECURITIES LAW, TAX LAW US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 8:56 am
In Tinnin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:58 am
., et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:25 am
Shammas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:16 pm
In an Aug. 28 decision in Wooley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
Class Action Complaint Against Amazon Challenging Shipping and Handling Fees Satisfied Rule 23 Requirements for Class Action Treatment California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Amazon.com alleging violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA); specifically, the class action complaint alleged that Amazon, in addition to receiving “a sales commission and a percentage of the sales price for each… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:18 am
Hyperquest, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:31 am
Case citation: BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:09 pm
" Forsyth County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Orrick cross-complained under the UCL, arguing that Upper Deck "had a pattern and practice of hiring law firms without the intent to pay the fees and, after incurring significant fees, claiming malpractice as a pretext to avoid paying the fees. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:31 am
Neutral Tandem, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:31 am
Neutral Tandem, Inc. v. [read post]